The House and Senate focused on their
proposed operating and budget plans last week. The House sent both its
operating and capital budgets to the Senate. Meanwhile, the Senate voted into
the night on its own operating budget plan, only to put it on hold until this
afternoon. The Senate has not yet introduced a capital budget proposal.
Senate to resume
floor action on operating budget today
April 3 — The Senate worked overnight and into the
early morning hours on Friday, April 3 to pass its version of the operating
budget. Fatigued, the Senate decided to resume the debate on this afternoon.
For details on SB 5077 and a summary of
earlier testimony, see the March 31 entry below.
House approves
proposed operating budget
April 2 – The House of Representatives
approved its operating budget proposal and sent it to the Senate. Contained in ESHB 1106, the plan:
·
Freezes tuition and
provides institutional support to help offset inflation and other costs.
·
Includes funding for the
State Need Grant. For 2013-14, 33,557 eligible students were unable to receive
a State Need Grant due to insufficient funds. Just more than half of those
students — 18,774 — attended community and technical colleges.
·
Fully funds collective
bargaining agreements, including salary increases, as negotiated by the
governor’s office: 3% the first year, 1.8% the second (including Highline
College and Yakima Valley Community College). Those increases are also given to
I-732-covered employees. Remaining compensation items (health benefit
contributions, pension contributions) are also fully funded.
·
Provides funding to
expand the MESA Community and Technical College Program to seven more colleges,
bringing the total to 13. The program helps under-represented students succeed
in college and pursue STEM careers.
Two floor amendments addressed topics that had previously
received testimony from the community and technical college system.
·
One amendment, supported
by the college system, would allow the Department of Corrections to use existing
state funds to offer associate degrees in prison.
·
The other amendment
would allow, for the 2015-2017 biennium, community and technical colleges to
use local funds to pay for increments when the state fails to do so. System
representatives had previously expressed concern that this would draw funds
away from programs and services needed by students and use one-time funds for
ongoing expenses.
Earlier
in the week (March 30), SBCTC Executive Director Marty Brown and Pierce College District Chancellor Michele Johnson testified before the
House Appropriations Committee.
“This
is a good budget for our system of 34 community and technical colleges and the
nearly 400,000 students we serve,” said Brown.
“Thank you for the tuition freeze coupled with the institutional support
to reflect inflation and other costs so our students and colleges can
successfully plan for the future.”
Johnson
applauded the House for fully funding collective bargaining agreements
negotiated through the governor’s office.
Link to testimony (starts at 3:00:07)
House approves
proposed capital budget
April 2 — The House of Representatives
approved its capital budget proposal and sent it to the Senate. Contained in EHB 1115, the plan:
·
Provides $272 million
for community and technical college capital projects, which is 74 percent of
the system’s request of $367.
·
Follows the system
priority list but funds only the first 15 of 24 projects on the list, one less
than the governor’s capital budget proposal.
Earlier
in the week (March 30) A panel of community and technical college
representatives expressed concern that
many projects only received partial funding and nine were left off the list
altogether.
Denise Yochum, Pierce College Fort
Steilacoom president, discussed the community and technical college system’s
competitive process for selecting and ranking projects on the capital priority
list. Each year, the system uses a predetermined set of criteria to classify
and prioritize capital projects. That list is submitted to the Legislature as
its capital budget request.
“The scoring process gives colleges a level playing field
in which to compete for the state’s limited capital budget resources,” Yochum
said. “This competition is tough and only the best proposals are added to the
system’s request. While we appreciate the [House] following our prioritized
list, we are concerned with the reduction in funding for projects that have
already been designed, and we are concerned with the overall funding level
which is proposed to be the lowest in recent history.”
The
panel also stressed that new projects and building renovations were necessary
for colleges to continue delivering high quality programs to meet student,
employer and community demand.
pointed out that building projects serve not only an
economic development purpose, but also a practical one. The college’s request
for design funding to renovate a Shop Building — which houses welding,
composites and precision machinery programs — would help meet local demand for aerospace
training and also include an elevator or ADA access to programs on the
building’s second floor.
·
Yochum starts at 15:52
·
Riveland starts at 17:57
·
Schoonmaker starts at
19:44
·
Ward starts at 21:21
Senate Ways and Means approves budget plan
·
Freezes tuition the
first year and reduces it the second year by 2% starting at 16 credits. It fully
offsets lost tuition revenue, but includes no institutional support for
inflation.
·
Reduces the State Need
Grant to reflect lower tuition.
·
Rejects collective
bargaining agreements negotiated by the governor’s office (including Highline
College and Yakima Valley Community College).
For employees covered by those agreements, the Senate proposes a $1,000
increase per employee for each of the next two years and is dependent upon
agreement being reached by June 30. The $1,000 increase also applies to
nonrepresented employees. I-732-covered employees are scheduled to receive
COLAs anticipated to be 1.8% the first year and 1.3% the second year. The plan
provides state funding for 85% of the above salary increases with the colleges
providing the remaining balance from existing resources, a $3 million cost to
the system. The remaining compensation items (health benefit contributions,
pension contributions) are funded at 65% an additional cost of $3 to $4
million.
·
Includes an estimated
$3.6 million “lean savings” cut in the back of the budget.